Digital Access

Digital Access
Access saukvalley.com and all Shaw Local content from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Home Delivery

Home Delivery
Local news, prep sports, Chicago sports, local and regional entertainment, business, home and lifestyle, food, classified and more! News you use every day! Daily, Daily including the e-Edition or e-Edition only.

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, prep sports scores, school closings, weather, and more. Text alerts are a free service from SaukValley.com, but text rates may apply.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
We'll deliver news & updates to your inbox. Sign up for free e-newsletters today.
Larry Lough

Easy to make public resent state pensioners

Political solutions usually have winners and losers.

That’s not going to be the case with whatever fix the Illinois Legislature eventually makes to the state’s public employee pension systems.

Everybody is going to lose.

Or, at least, nobody is going to win.

That’s what happens when you can no longer ignore a $100 billion unfunded liability.

To be exact, $104.6 billion at the end of 2014.

And growing.

ILLINOIS VOTERS IN November added another name to the list of more than 11,000 government retirees who are drawing six-figure state pensions.

Pat Quinn, who lost his bid for re-election as governor, is now having to get by on his monthly state pension of nearly $11,400.

That’s the government retirement income he earned for 35 years in public life, which included being state treasurer, lieutenant governor, and – for the past 6 years – governor.

That calculates to $136,752 a year.

The anti-tax group Taxpayers United of America estimates that by 2025, more than 25,000 government retirees in Illinois will be drawing state pensions of at least $100,000 a year.

All legal. All proper. All above board.

But pretty ridiculous.

THAT’S THE BIG emotional argument.

The anti-tax, anti-union political forces want to make participants in the public pension systems the bad guys.

“Our study shows that Lee and Whiteside County taxpayers are still being robbed blind by government bureaucrats in the form of lavish, gold-plated pensions,” Rae Ann McNeilly, executive director of the Taxpayers Union of America, said in a recent news release.

She called them “thieves,” comparing them to Rita Crundwell.

In fact, about two dozen retirees from local governments in Lee and Whiteside counties – most of them former educators – get pensions of more than $100,000 a year.

Hundreds of others in our community receive state pensions that exceed the average household income of working families in those two counties.

And the average retirement age for those state pensioners is under 60.

Then throw in a 3 percent annual increase – guaranteed – even if state revenues plummet and pension investments tank.

So a little populist demagoguery can easily make the public resent the pensioners.

After all, that money came from taxpayers.

REMEMBER SOME important things about those pensions.

Pensioners are not taking anything they are not legally entitled to have.

They contributed to those pensions, as did their public employers, and they should be expected to earn a reasonable return on investment of that money during the 30 or so years of their working life.

All benefits were obtained through state law or collective bargaining.

Democratic and Republican legislators have, over the years, been almost unanimous in voting to fatten and protect government pensions.

Democratic and Republican governors have negotiated contracts, including pension benefits, with public employee unions.

Unions have done a good job of looking out for the interests of their members.

But all of those players, apparently, ignored the realities of economics and math that make such a system unsustainable unless we unduly punish taxpayers or starve education, local governments, the prison system, and myriad other state programs and services.

Now it’s time for us to pay the piper.

YOU INTERESTED IN the size of the state pension check being drawn by that retired teacher down the street, or by your brother-in-law, the former cop?

It’s public money, so it’s public record.

The Better Government Association has a website you can visit to find out: http://www.bettergov.org/pension/

First name, last name, search – and Bingo!

You will find lots of pensioners who receive $25,000 or less, not unlike Social Security recipients.

Of course, you will also find a lot of folks who get $50,000 or more, which nobody on Social Security receives – and which exceeds average household income in Lee and Whiteside counties.

The pension system for government employees in Illinois has been generous.

And, because of the pension protection clause in the state constitution, it will not be easy to change it in a way that will help to bail out the state’s fiscal mess.

Not anytime soon, anyway.

WHO IS GOING TO get hurt in the process?

First, people and agencies that already have suffered because their programs have been reduced or eliminated so the state could feed the increasing pension obligations that it still couldn’t keep up with. Things won’t get better while the state plays catch-up.

Second, pensioners themselves are likely to be targeted for Illinois’ only tax on retirement income. That probably will affect only those who draw at least $50,000 a year – but that’s more than 78,500 retirees statewide, according to estimates.

Third, short of saving billions of dollars by closing the state a couple of days a week, state officials will look to taxpayers for “revenue enhancement,” which will probably include a “surcharge” on services such as haircuts and tune-ups. Another temporary increase in the income tax could also be part of the fix.

Fourth ... well, everybody else – if there’s anybody left.

GOV. RAUNER and his Democratic buddies in the Legislature will first have to figure out how to get the state through this fiscal year, which ends June 30. That has to be done pretty quickly.

Then they’ll need a budget plan for the next fiscal year, which starts July 1.

So they don’t have a lot of time.

Local government leaders are already squealing about the heavy knife Rauner wants to take to state aid.

And there is plenty more pain where that came from.

You might want to work on your squeal.

Comments