Digital Access

Digital Access
Access saukvalley.com and all Shaw Media Illinois content from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Home Delivery

Home Delivery
Local news, prep sports, Chicago sports, local and regional entertainment, business, home and lifestyle, food, classified and more! News you use every day! Daily, Daily including the e-Edition or e-Edition only.

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, prep sports scores, school closings, weather, and more. Text alerts are a free service from SaukValley.com, but text rates may apply.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
We'll deliver news & updates to your inbox. Sign up for free e-newsletters today.
Local Editorials

OUR VIEW: Cap on teacher pay raises should be reinstated

State is in no shape to legislate additional pension obligations

Faced with a steadily growing, almost $140 billion in unfunded pension obligations, Illinois lawmakers last month astoundingly decided the only sane course of action was to make things worse.

In late May, the Illinois Education Association begged lawmakers to lift a recently imposed 3 percent cap on pay raises for teachers in the final 4 years of their careers, with union President Kathi Griffin going so far as to say killing the cap was needed “to help save the teaching profession.” The ploy worked, as the General Assembly voted to restore the 6 percent limit that had been in effect since 2005.

It was only last year when lawmakers lowered the limit on end-of-career pay raises from 6 percent to 3 percent. The cap was instituted to keep pension-inflating pay raises for teachers in check. Their pension is determined based on an average of their highest 4 consecutive years of salary in the 10 years before retirement.

The 2018 change wasn’t even absolute – lawmakers granted local school boards the power to award raises greater than 3 percent as long as the district agreed to assume responsibility for the increased pension liability. School board members who choose to spend resources that way would at least have to answer to its local voters.

By rolling back the cap statewide, we’ve returned to the status quo, where a district that can afford the increased salary at the end of a teacher’s career doesn’t have to worry about that raise’s impact on pension payouts because part of the expense is spread across the broader Teacher Retirement System. In years past, it had become customary for teachers to be removed from the salary scale and awarded 6% raises in the years before their retirement; it’s almost certain that practice will resume. 

In December, the General Assembly’s Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability said the unfunded pension liability climbed from $129 billion in fiscal 2017 to $133.5 billion at the end of 2018, and projected the number would hit $136.8 billion at the end of fiscal 2019 on June 30, then $139 billion in fiscal 2020.

In other words, Illinois is in no position to increase its pension obligations, but that’s exactly what lawmakers did in giving a concession to the teachers unions. Reversing this one attempt at pension reform so quickly means not a single lawmaker, taxpayer or school board member got a real idea of if it would have the intended positive effect. Nor did we have a chance to actually observe any unintended consequences and react accordingly.

In the same legislative session, lawmakers established a statewide minimum wage scale for teachers, establishing a $32,076 minimum in the 2020-2021 school year, increasing to $40,000 over the following 3 years. That on its own was not enough to save the teaching profession?

It’s blatantly unfair, given the property tax burden and the state’s unfunded pension obligations, for school districts to be expected to award their most senior, highest-paid employees with outsized pay raises. 

Opponents of the reform said the raise cap kept teachers from doing things that would push their salaries too high – and if that’s the case, a revised bill should be introduced next year to address that issue. 

But this small attempt at pension reform should not be scrapped for good simply because a few soon-to-retire teachers weren’t able to teach overflow classes or be football coaches.

Loading more