Fair
78°FFairFull Forecast

Charge gun owner, too

Published: Wednesday, Sept. 3, 2014 1:15 a.m. CDT

How is it that the owner of a gun used by a child in the accidental shooting of his friend, is not being charged with reckless endangerment of a child?

How is it that a child is paying for the recklessness of his parent?

Is the owner’s position as a state trooper shielding him and making a teenager shoulder the blame for his recklessness?

Shame on the authorities.

Note to readers: As Sauk Valley Media reported Aug. 27, state law requires that guns be secured if a child on the premises is younger than 14. The boy who held the gun when it accidentally discharged and killed his friend was 15 at the time.

National video



Reader Poll

Do you think the Minnesota dentist who killed Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe should be prosecuted?
Yes
No