Partly Cloudy
45°FPartly CloudyFull Forecast

Opposes new definitions for marriage words

Published: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 1:15 a.m. CDT

March 19 would have been my 48th wedding anniversary. It wasn’t, because my wife passed away 18 months ago.

While I miss her greatly, it is OK because the time we had together was good. I never regretted our marriage, and I was fortunate to have known her. I suppose that we will meet again. I hope so.

The words that I feel are ours, are “marriage,” “husband” and “wife.” My wife was a woman. I am a man. We entered into both a religious and legal partnership that was a marriage. The husband in this relationship is a man, and the wife is a woman.

Recently, there is much going on about same-sex individuals becoming married. Bless their hearts, I am all for it. They have every right to join into a binding legal and religious union. No one should die alone. 

What I am against is using the words that have always connoted an opposite-sex relationship. A union between same sex individuals should not be called a marriage. Call it something else.

A man should not call another man his wife or husband. A woman should not call another woman her wife or husband. 

Those words are ours. They were my wife’s, and they were mine. Let them be.

More News

National video

Reader Poll

Illinois lawmakers are considering a constitutional amendment to switch from a flat income tax (same rate for all) to a progressive income tax (multiple rates that increase with wealth). What do you think?
I approve
I disapprove
Not sure
No opinion