Digital Access

Digital Access
Access saukvalley.com from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Home Delivery

Home Delivery
Local news, prep sports, Chicago sports, local and regional entertainment, business, home and lifestyle, food, classified and more! News you use every day! Daily, Daily including the e-Edition or e-Edition only.

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, prep sports scores, school closings, weather, and more. Text alerts are a free service from SaukValley.com, but text rates may apply.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
We'll deliver news & updates to your inbox. Sign up for free e-newsletters today.
Letters to the Editor

Mandatory helmet law is necessary

It was with mouth-dropping amazement and sadness that I read the Nov. 9 Telegraph headline: “Are helmet laws needed?”

As a general surgeon responsible for trauma care in the Sauk Valley for 30 years, I’ve cared for numerous patients in motorcycle accidents where their only injury was a head injury because of the lack of a helmet.

Those injuries led either to death or to lifelong debilitating disabilities.

I was also a state evaluator of trauma programs, and a distressing fact was how many more head injuries occurred across our state compared to other states with helmet laws.

Therefore, another way to phrase this headline would be: “Should we attempt to preserve life, or should we allow as many head injuries as possible to increase the number of organs available for transplant?”

The article did a commendable review of the reasons helmet laws are rational. 

Statistically, it’s irrefutable that wearing a helmet when on a motorcycle significantly reduces the number of fatal and debilitating injuries.

It’s also irrefutable that head injuries cause a significant drain on our economy by direct medical costs, in great part sustained by the taxpayer, and by indirect loss of productivity of the injured.

The argument given by ABATE against helmet laws is absurd. If the logic of “the right of choice” was valid, there would be no speed limits, seat belt laws, or child restraint laws, negating 50 years of progress in decreasing traffic accident injuries and deaths. Existing seat belt and child restraint laws have saved millions of people from death and major injuries, and our economy billions of dollars.

I’ll never understand how our state legislators support seat belt laws and not helmet laws.

For the sake of our citizens’ health and our state’s economy, I pray someday our representatives will wake up, be courageous and consistent, and adopt common-sense laws that save lives and money.

Loading more