Can the Bears survive three, four or six games with Josh McCown at quarterback in place of the injured Jay Cutler?
Yes, they can.
Cutler is a significantly better quarterback than McCown, and no one is pretending otherwise.
Cutler has one of the best arms in the league and a hair trigger to match. McCown’s arm is average, as is his release.
Both have decent athleticism and mobility, but McCown’s slightly greater in that area, and he’s more likely to use them.
Cutler has the kind of gunslinger mentality that leads to magic moments and shattering disappointments. McCown is like a coach on the field. He won’t be the guy who wins a game for you, but he’s less likely to lose one.
Cutler has franchise quarterback potential. McCown does not.
Fortunately, none of that is particularly relevant at the moment. Although Cutler clearly was playing the best football of his career when he suffered a severe groin injury against the Washington Redskins on Sunday, he was nowhere near achieving his full potential. And he was still making the occasional big mistake.
The Bears’ offense is significantly better this year, partly because Cutler has improved. But more so because of the arrival of coach Marc Trestman and the beginning of the implementation of his scheme. There has been dramatic improvement on the offensive line, at tight end and at receiver.
McCown doesn’t need to be what Cutler could be for the Bears to split their next four games or maybe even go 3-2 and keep their playoff hopes alive.
All McCown needs to do is distribute the football to Matt Forte, Brandon Marshall, Martellus Bennett, Alshon Jeffery and Michael Bush (Yes, the Bears must rediscover Bush), and not make the kind of big mistakes that cost games.
The Bears’ challenges, before they can reasonably hope to see Cutler under center again, are Green Bay, Detroit, Baltimore, St. Louis and Minnesota. I don’t see them beating the Packers, but they will be favored – and rightfully so – over the Vikings and Rams.
The Ravens might even be a pretty good matchup for the Bears in their wounded state, and the Bears could be the favorite there.
If Detroit comes to Chicago with a limping Calvin Johnson and Charles Tillman is ready to go, the Lions certainly are no lock.
A glass-half-full guy has to argue 3-2 is the likely outcome of the next 6 weeks – assuming the offense does what it has to – and that gets the Bears to 7-5 and in good shape to chase the playoffs.
The problem is, the defense could cause the Bears to go 0-5. Who’s the better quarterback to help your defense? Although the heavy lifting clearly is up to Trestman, in this scenario, even if both are healthy, I’d have to think hard about saying McCown.
To nurse his defense along until Lance Briggs gets back, Trestman has to keep it off the field. Where he’s failed at that so far is converting third downs, running the football enough, putting together long drives and keeping the clock moving.
In a pure West Coast offense, short passes are just as good as run plays, perhaps better, as long as they are completed. But running plays are like body blows in a heavyweight fight, and a productive Bush on top of Forte’s 18 to 20 carries could be huge. Either way, move the chains slowly, keep the clock running.
The one area where McCown probably is better than Cutler is accuracy. Cutler misses too many passes he should hit.
Additionally, Cutler is far more likely than McCown to check out of a run or short pass to go for something he thinks he sees downfield. With this defense, you just can’t do it.
The Bears absolutely can win with McCown. The question is, can they win without Briggs?
And remember guys, his name is McCown, not McNown.