32°FOvercastFull Forecast
Shaw Media Auctions

Nonprofit buys Sauk Commons

Buyer has capital to invest in improvements

(Philip Marruffo/pmarruffo@saukvalley.com)
The 144-bed Sauk Commons student housing complex, which opened in fall 2005 just east of the campus and since has struggled to get enough occupants to be financially viable, has been bought by United Housing and Community Services Corp., a Los Angeles-based nonprofit. It no longer is owned by Sauk Valley Student Housing LLC, said Amy Viering, dean of community outreach for Sauk Valley Community College and executive director of the Sauk Foundation.
(Philip Marruffo/pmarruffo@saukvalley.com)
Lydia Box, a Sauk Valley Community College sophomore and former Sauk Valley women's basketball player, studies in her Sauk Valley Commons apartment Monday. United Housing and Community Services Corp., a Los Angeles-based nonprofit, has bought the student housing complex and plans to do some repairs, update furnishings and work to attract more occupants, said William Levy, CEO of Best Management Onward Campus, which will continue to manage the complex.

DIXON – The beleaguered Sauk Commons student housing complex could see some renewed interest and, officials hope, higher occupancy by the start of next school year.

Late last week, United Housing and Community Services Corp., a Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization, bought the complex, said Amy Viering, dean of community outreach for Sauk Valley Community College and executive director of the Sauk Foundation.

Sauk Valley Student Housing LLC, a nonprofit group created by the foundation, had owned the complex next door to the college.

It was built for about $7 million using tax-exempt revenue bonds and opened in fall 2005. Occupancy never came close to the 144-bed capacity, and the complex never was financially viable.

In February 2011, Sauk Valley Student Housing filed for bankruptcy. The corporation and its creditor, Harris Bank, sought a buyer or investor for the complex.

The buyer had a few options to finance the sale, Viering said, among them to ask that a local government issue bonds.

Last month, the Sterling City Council denied a request to issue up to $5 million in bonds to refinance Sauk Commons to take advantage of federal tax incentives. Council members had reservations about the request and its potential impact on the city and its reputation.

The buyer must have found another means to finance the sale, Viering said.

Sauk Valley Student Housing and the Sauk Foundation now have no financial or management responsibility to the student housing complex, she said.

The college, which never directly was affiliated with the complex, is glad the new buyer will continue to operate the facility for its intended purpose: student housing, she said.

For the foreseeable future, Best Management Onward Campus, a Madison, Wis.-based management company, will continue to manage the student housing complex, CEO William Levy said.

The company is glad that someone has a renewed interest in the complex, which has seen few upgrades since it opened more than 7 years ago, Levy said.

"They're going to put capital in, make some improvements, buy some furnishings."

The complex has 48 two- and four-bedroom, fully furnished apartments in two buildings. It also has a sports court, barbecue pavilion, and clubhouse with study rooms, a lounge and laundry room.

Sauk Commons is about 80 percent full with almost 80 students in available apartments, said Maurice Redwine, the on site manager. Some apartments are not available for rent because they need repairs, he said.

The change in hands and the likely improvements to the complex should spark a reinvigorated marketing campaign, Levy said.

The Sauk Valley Community College district is "huge," and more and more students – even those who could easily commute – are seeking that "campus-life experience" at 2-year colleges, he said.



National video

Reader Poll

Rock Falls is considering a ban on leaf burning. Should the city finally take that step?
Yes. Sterling and Dixon have had bans for years. It’s time for Rock Falls to impose a ban.
No. It would be too great a burden for homeowners to dispose of fallen leaves in other ways.
Not sure
No opinion