Dillard: I’m your man for 2014

Tells Lee County Republicans it’s time for a governor not from Chicago

DIXON — Kirk Dillard made no secret he is a gubernatorial hopeful for 2014.

While nothing is official, the state senator told fellow Republicans on Friday that he can work better with the state’s Democrats than any of his potential primary competitors. Dillard delivered the keynote speech at the 24th annual Reagan Day Dinner held at the Dixon Elks Lodge.

U.S. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Manteno, State Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, State Rep. Donald Moffitt, R-Galesburg, and State Rep. Tom Demmer, R-Dixon also spoke.

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com

Blogs

» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."
» Out Here
Out Here

On pensions, Bivins and GOP far apart

Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, joined with many of his fellow Senate Republicans this week to reject a pension bill sponsored by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago. The measure passed 40-16. Bivins had a different reason for his no vote.

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all