Help complete library vision by donating

It’s with great excitement I write about the Lanark Library Board meeting on Jan. 15, which was actually held in the new shared municipal building at 111 S. Broad St.

The need for more library space for collection development, technology and public programming has been a long-term goal of the board for many years, with that project having the official title, “Vision for the Future.”

The building infrastructure has been completed, and the next chapter begins. The major item of business discussed was the purchase of tables, technology chairs, shelving, and library specific furniture. It’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the community to welcome a new library in this key downtown location.  

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com

Blogs

» Extra! Extra! - A blog by Chris Heimerman
Extra! Extra! - A blog by Chris Heimerman

My kind of game

I would have gladly paid to take in the game I covered Saturday morning in Morrison.
» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all