Partly Cloudy
65°FPartly CloudyFull Forecast

Union-friendly bills await turn in Legislature

Illinois unlikely to follow lead of neighbor states

Published: Wednesday, Dec. 19, 2012 1:15 a.m. CDT

(Continued from Page 1)

In the last 2 years, our Midwestern neighbors in Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan have curtailed the power of labor unions.

Just last week, Michigan became a right-to-work state. 

Earlier this year, it was Indiana.

In 2010, Wisconsin eliminated many collective bargaining privileges for most government unions.

Some in the Illinois Legislature would like to buck this trend by pushing legislation that’s more supportive of unions.

Whether this happens is up to three Chicago Democrats: House Speaker Michael Madigan, Gov. Pat Quinn, and Senate President John Cullerton. 

A good legislative barometer for the next 2 years may well be what happens with three bills during the lame-duck session:

n SB 1565 – Would raise the minimum wage to $10.55 from $8.25, which would give Illinois the highest minimum wage in the nation.

n SB 2643 – Would essentially keep non-union contractors from bidding on most local government projects, even if they agree to pay the prevailing wage.

n SB 3695 – Would expand the accounting responsibilities for non-union contractors, leaving them more vulnerable to a making a clerical error that could result in losing the ability to bid on government contracts.

There is also SB 1556, which would strip certain high-ranking state employees of their union representation. 

“We are really concerned about the prevailing wage bill because it will just drive up the cost to local governments by limiting who can bid on contracts,” said Joe McCoy, a lobbyist for the Illinois Municipal League. 

Kim Maisch, Illinois state director for the National Federation of Independent Business, said it unfairly penalizes non-union businesses even when they pay a “prevailing wage” equal to what union contractors are paying. 

And many business groups see the minimum wage bill as emblematic of state government’s indifference to business competiveness. 

Whether the bills will be called is in the hands of the Democratic leaders.

It will be interesting to see what they do next month in the wake of the Michigan right-to-work vote.

From Squeezy

to hot-dog meat

Yes, Quinn’s latest pension video is rather amateurish. Thankfully, it doesn’t feature Squeezy the Pension Python this time; instead, this video features a group of children choosing to talk about pension debt rather than hot-dog meat. 

And no, it isn’t particularly funny – even though it tries hard to be. 

But come on, what do we expect? It was produced by the state of Illinois – not Walt Disney.

My main concern about the video isn’t its amateur quality but that it focused on spending rather than on savings.

The video shows how pension payments are outstripping what the state spends on early childhood education, child care services, and other state programs.

It doesn’t mention that legislators raised income taxes 67 percent, or that the money this tax increase generated has gone almost exclusively toward paying for the government employee pensions.

Nowhere in the video does Quinn even hint that we can make those children’s lives better by fixing the pension mess and lowering their parents’ taxes so they can better save for their college educations. 

Instead, it takes a “government knows best” approach that suggests if it weren’t for those doggone pensions, the state could focus on providing core government programs.

Note to readers – Scott Reeder’s column is underwritten by the Illinois Policy Institute.

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page

National video

Reader Poll

A constitutional amendment on the Nov. 8 ballot would block Illinois from spending money collected through transportation taxes for non-transportation purposes. What do you think?
I support the amendment
I don't
Not sure
No opinion