Digital Access

Digital Access
Access saukvalley.com from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Home Delivery

Home Delivery
Local news, prep sports, Chicago sports, local and regional entertainment, business, home and lifestyle, food, classified and more! News you use every day! Daily, Daily including the e-Edition or e-Edition only.

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, prep sports scores, school closings, weather, and more. Text alerts are a free service from SaukValley.com, but text rates may apply.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
We'll deliver news & updates to your inbox. Sign up for free e-newsletters today.
The Holiday Gift Auction is Live! Click here and bid now on great local gifts!
Letters to the Editor

Benefits of tax hike are small; vote ‘no’ Nov. 6

I gave the sales tax increase serious thought, even attending a well-done presentation at Reagan Middle School and reading “Boomtown,” but I cannot support this tax-and-spend policy.

n It’s a permanent cost-of-living increase. A great Lee County positive is escaping Chicago and suburban tax rates and high cost of living. Do we really want to keep eroding that huge advantage?

n It damages commerce and business. Nickel-and-dime arguments promoting tax hikes have produced destructive cumulative totals, which do affect consumer spending. Many businesses, including mine, avoid raising prices despite rising costs. A sales tax forces a price increase, without any profit to help the business.

n It’s regressive taxation, falling heaviest on those struggling with this economy. Are we willing to hurt those who can least afford it?

n It’s a moral hazard, bailing out Illinois’ budgetary failures and corruption. Do we reward failure by voting higher taxes onto ourselves? There is political movement to transfer pension costs onto local governments (causing yet more taxes). Should we signal we’re eager to absorb their mistakes?

n It’s an inefficient use of education funds. Proponents misrepresent the incremental benefits of bigger facilities with the more impressive benefits of introducing athletic opportunity where there is none.

n It’s a broad taxation for an earmarked, narrow benefit. Many criticize tax-and-spend policy – until they benefit. Let that not be said of us. I support this facility (and infrastructure generally), but not the permanent tax hike. Instead, combine growth with fiscal discipline for a path both visionary and prudent.

Loading more