Bad math plagues debate on sales tax proposal

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

You have every right to be skeptical about taking math counsel from an editor.

An old newsroom joke is that there are three kinds of journalists: those who can do math, and those who can’t.

But this lifelong baseball fan developed an appreciation for averages and percentages.

The current debate in Lee County over a tax referendum might be simpler if everyone were a lifelong baseball fan.

Because part of the political conflict over this ballot initiative has centered on incorrect, exaggerated and misunderstood numbers.

Math is hard enough; politics makes it harder.

THIS ISN’T ABOUT whether you should vote Yes or No on the referendum.

(For the record, Yes is placed above No on the ballot.)

Some people think the additional sales tax is needed.

Some people think it is not justified.

And some people are confused – not so much about the arguments as about the math.

Fractions and decimals and percentages can be confusing.

We suggest total immersion into baseball.

THE WORDING OF the Lee County referendum, which is on the Nov. 6 ballot, is as simple as referendum language gets:

Shall a retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax (commonly referred to as a “sales tax”) be imposed in The County of Lee, Illinois, at a rate of 1% to be used exclusively for school facility purposes?

In other words, Are you willing to pay a new 1 percent sales tax to raise money to construct and maintain buildings in public school districts throughout Lee County?

That means that when you buy “qualifying” items, you would pay an extra penny on the dollar.

If voters approve the referendum, a $5 hammer will cost an extra nickel; you will pay a quarter more for a $25 shirt; that 18-inch TV on sale at Christmas for $100 will cost an additional dollar.

Your groceries and prescription drugs – even a new car – will cost no more than they do now.

That’s the simple explanation.

BUT, YES, THE NEW sales tax rate for some goods purchased in Dixon would increase by 14.8 percent – which some folks have conveniently rounded up to 15 percent.

Previous Page|1||

Comments

Blogs

» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."
» Out Here
Out Here

On pensions, Bivins and GOP far apart

Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, joined with many of his fellow Senate Republicans this week to reject a pension bill sponsored by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago. The measure passed 40-16. Bivins had a different reason for his no vote.

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all