‘Vote your gut’ in November

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

With an upcoming presidential election, I’d like to share some thoughts on “Obamacare.” New legislation states that anyone working 30 or more hours a week is entitled to employer-sponsored health insurance. This new law was meant to protect people like me; however, that is not the case.

The lawmakers neglected to write in something preventing employers from reducing work hours to avoid paying the extra insurance coverage. I recently got an email from our human resource department that cut my hours from 30 to 25 hours a week. Now I’m expected to buy insurance for myself with less money. If the corporations, nonprofits and small businesses can’t afford this, how can I?

In my defense, my husband, who is self-employed, and I tried to keep a health insurance policy, and the premiums went up every year, even though we never filed a claim. Soon they were half again what our mortgage payments were, so we canceled the policy.

While I’m at it, I’d like to point out that I not only live in a city whose last comptroller made national headlines, but I also live in a state with a history of corruption and in the bottom five for financial responsibility. Our president is an ex-Illinois senator as well. Do we need a nationwide Illinois?

I’m not sure Romney is the answer, but I know Obama is not. So don’t vote because your daddy voted that way, but look at the real issues and vote your gut.

Previous Page|1|Next Page

Comments

Blogs

» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."
» Out Here
Out Here

On pensions, Bivins and GOP far apart

Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, joined with many of his fellow Senate Republicans this week to reject a pension bill sponsored by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago. The measure passed 40-16. Bivins had a different reason for his no vote.

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all