Newspapers have many kinds of customers

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

Our Opinion pages, over time, reflect the wide variety of thoughts and ideas of our readers – even those with which we disagree.

On our Opinion pages you will see conservatives and liberals, Democrats and Republicans, and people who think between and outside those broad labels. Our hope is to promote an intellectually honest debate in the pursuit of truth, but we know the disingenuous nature of political speech makes that nearly impossible. Still, we try to edit out any outright falsehoods that contributors offer.

Our job includes facilitating public discussion – in fact, we are still the primary public forum in this market. You are invited to join – in print or online.

5. SAY “YES”:  Find some way to accommodate every customer’s reasonable request.

We want to find some way to get your information published, even if it’s not Page 1 news.

Our Community section, which is published each Saturday, includes news by, from and about our readers. You are welcome to contribute. And it’s free! All submissions are subject to editing for style, length and content.

If you want total control of the size, timing, content and placement of your message, we can help there, too.

We call it advertising. That, of course, comes with a cost.

But income from those ads helps us to offer our many services to our many different customers.

Thank you for being one of them.

|||3|Next Page

Comments

Blogs

» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."
» Out Here
Out Here

On pensions, Bivins and GOP far apart

Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, joined with many of his fellow Senate Republicans this week to reject a pension bill sponsored by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago. The measure passed 40-16. Bivins had a different reason for his no vote.

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all