Landowners can speak ill of wind company

Wind energy companies' contracts with landowners include confidentiality clauses, which may not be as extensive as some may believe.

Recently, I obtained two early versions of proposed contracts by Mainstream Renewable Power, which is planning a wind farm in Lee, Whiteside and Bureau counties.

Last year, a wind farm opponent suggested the confidentiality clauses barred landowners from discussing health problems that they believe resulted from nearby wind turbines.

That allegation was made during a meeting of the Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals, which was considering changes to the county's wind energy ordinance.

Asked during the meeting about the opponent's claim, John Martin of Mainstream declined to comment, saying confidentiality clauses themselves were "inherently confidential."

Audience members snickered.

Another Mainstream representative, Keith Bolin, said no one would be barred from talking about their health. He said he was offended at the insinuation they couldn't.

Bolin was correct, as the early versions of the contract show.

In one version, the confidentiality clause reads, "The landowner agrees that all confidential information received by the landowner relating to the wind power project or developer is the property of the developer and shall be kept absolutely secret, undisclosed, in trust and in confidence…"

What does this include?

The terms of the contract and Mainstream's business activities, client lists, technical specifications, among other things.

I could find nothing in either version of the contract that stops people from blaming turbines for poor health. In fact, no provision bars landowners with turbines from speaking ill of Mainstream or its project.
If the terms of the lease are confidential, how did we get copies? A landowner initially interested in having turbines soured on the idea. This landowner never signed the agreement, so wasn't bound by its terms. This kind person gave it to us.

That's how we could make the "inherently confidential" confidentiality clause completely public.


Sauk Valley Media reporter David Giuliani covers Whiteside and Lee county governments, Morrison and other smaller communities. He can be reached at dgiuliani@saukvalley or at 800-798-4085, ext. 525.

Story Archived

Only the most recent 7 days of articles are available for free. For articles older than 7 days there is a small fee for retrieval from our archive. If you are a registered member of the site, the content is free just by signing in below.

Please sign in with your Comment Member ID and password.

Did you purchase access?

Member ID:
Password:
Forgot Your Password?
Register to comment.

Purchase Access
To allow for flexibility, we offer a variety of options for purchasing articles:
Purchase options


Having trouble?

If you have any technical difficulties, either with your username and password or with the payment options, please contact us by e-mail at archivedesk@shawmedia.com

Blogs

» Out Here
Out Here

Wise saw collapse in support

Last week, Sterling Alderwoman Amy Viering attended her last meeting as a city official. She gave the usual praise one hears at such departures. But one compliment stuck out. At the end of her speech, she turned to City Administrator Scott Shumard and said, "You're awesome."
» Out Here
Out Here

On pensions, Bivins and GOP far apart

Sen. Tim Bivins, R-Dixon, joined with many of his fellow Senate Republicans this week to reject a pension bill sponsored by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton of Chicago. The measure passed 40-16. Bivins had a different reason for his no vote.

Reader Poll

How concerned are you that the IRS targeted conservative political groups for additional and often burdensome scrutiny?

Very concerned
Somewhat concerned
Not very concerned
Not concerned at all

You have already taken part in this poll.